Jose Rubin Statham vs Matthew Barton, Kyoto Challenger 2012, Qualifying R2

Challenger · Qualifying R2 · Carpet · Sun 4 Mar

Final

Jose Rubin Statham

LostRank #1038

Barton won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 16–7⁵

Set 26–3

Set 35–7

Matthew Barton

WinnerRank #1017

Venue

Kataoka Arena Kyoto

Kyoto, JPN· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

17 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

87%

Very humid

Temperature

10°C

Cool

Altitude

30 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

3Statham

3Barton

6 meetings

Carpet 0–1Hard 1–2Clay 1–0Grass 1–0

Kyoto ChallengerQualifying R2 · 4 Mar 2012CarpetThis match
Matthew Barton
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 3Set 3: 7
Jose Rubin Statham
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6Set 3: 5
Canberra 2 ChallengerRound of 32 · 31 Oct 2017Hard
Jose Rubin Statham
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Matthew Barton
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6⁴
Traralgon ChallengerQuarterfinal · 30 Oct 2015Hard
Matthew Barton
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jose Rubin Statham
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
MorningtonFinal · 2015Clay
Jose Rubin Statham
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Matthew Barton
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 4
West Lakes ChallengerRound of 32 · 4 Feb 2014Hard
Matthew Barton
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jose Rubin Statham
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1
BerriRound of 16 · 2010Grass
Jose Rubin Statham
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Matthew Barton
Sets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jose Rubin Statham vs Matthew Barton, Kyoto Challenger 2012, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research