Robby Ginepri vs Carsten Ball, Dallas Challenger 2012, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Hard · Wed 8 Feb

Final

Robby Ginepri

LostRank #12211.4565%

Ball won in 2 sets · 1h 28m

0–2

Set 16–7⁵

Set 26–7³

Carsten Ball

WinnerRank #13682.6435%Upset

Venue

T Bar M Racquet Club

Dallas, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

193 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 28m

4Aces16

0Double faults4

54Service points won65

12Service games played12

12Service games won12

12Return games played12

0/0Break points saved100%9/9

0/90%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

0Ginepri

1Ball

1 meeting

Dallas ChallengerRound of 16 · 8 Feb 2012HardThis match
Carsten Ball
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 7⁷
Robby Ginepri
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6³

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Robby Ginepri vs Carsten Ball, Dallas Challenger 2012, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research