Jan Satral vs Julien Obry, Fes 2011, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
4-6 6-3 6-2Venue and conditions
TCFFes, MAR
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
0Satral
2Obry
2 meetingsClay 0–1Hard 0–1
- FesQuarterfinal · 2011ClayThis matchJulien ObrySets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Jan SatralSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 2
- Antalya-BelcontiQuarterfinal · 2014HardJulien ObrySets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 64Set 3: 6Jan SatralSets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 7Set 3: 3
Form and path
Jan Satral1–5
Jablonec Nad NisouClay
MostClay
PragueClay
Julien Obry2–4
BressuireHard
Port El KantaouiHard
- LRound of 32Petr MichnevSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Julien ObrySets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 64
Quimper CHHard
CartagenaClay
- LRound of 32Marco BortolottiSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 0Set 3: 6Julien ObrySets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.