Stefan Micov vs Vadim Alekseenko, Niš 2011, Round of 16
Final score
Final
6-0 6-2Venue and conditions
Teniska akademija Živković (TAŽ), BubanjNiš, SRB
ClayCourt speed90.6Very slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
0Micov
1Alekseenko
1 meeting- NišRound of 16 · 2011ClayThis matchVadim AlekseenkoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Stefan MicovSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 2
Form and path
Stefan Micov3–3
SkopjeClay
Skopje CHClay
Kursumlijska BanjaClay
- LRound of 32Viktor MarkovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Stefan MicovSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
- WQualifying R3Stefan MicovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Samuel Martinez ArjonaSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R2Stefan MicovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Astro PilipovicSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R1Stefan MicovSets won: 0Set 1: 4Luka VuglarSets won: 0Set 1: 0
Luka Vuglar · Retired
Vadim Alekseenko1–5
AntalyaClay
BuchaClay
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.