Ivo Klec vs Tsung Hua Yang, Samarkand 2011, Round of 16
Final score
Final
1-6 6-4 6-3Venue and conditions
Tennis Club Dinamo, SamarkandSamarkand, UZB
ClayCourt speed3.5 vs last year102.4Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 42m4Aces3
3Double faults2
53Service points won41
13Service games played13
8Service games won8
13Return games played13
10/1567%Break points saved29%2/7
5/771%Break points converted33%5/15
Head to head
0Klec
2Yang
2 meetingsClay 0–1Hard 0–1
- SamarkandRound of 16 · 10 Aug 2011ClayThis matchTsung Hua YangSets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Ivo KlecSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 3
- BusanQuarterfinal · 11 May 2012HardTsung Hua YangSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Ivo KlecSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.