Nicolas Massu vs Michael Mcclune, Winnetka Challenger 2011, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sat 25 Jun

Final

Nicolas Massu

LostRank #1015

Mcclune won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 16–7⁵

Set 24–6

Michael Mcclune

WinnerRank #1070

Venue

A.C. Nielsen Tennis Center, Winnetka

Winnetka, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

67%

Moderate

Temperature

24°C

Warm

Altitude

193 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Massu

1Mcclune

2 meetings

Hard 0–1Clay 1–0

Winnetka ChallengerQualifying R1 · 25 Jun 2011HardThis match
Michael Mcclune
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Nicolas Massu
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 4
Savannah ChallengerQualifying R1 · 20 Apr 2013Clay
Nicolas Massu
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Michael Mcclune
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Nicolas Massu vs Michael Mcclune, Winnetka Challenger 2011, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research