Victor Ionita vs Stephan Hoiss, Bacău 2011, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
6-2 6-3Venue and conditions
SCM Bacău tennis courtsBacău, ROU
ClayCourt speed89.0Very slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Ionita
0Hoiss
1 meeting- BacăuQuarterfinal · 2011ClayThis matchVictor IonitaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Stephan HoissSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
Form and path
Victor Ionita3–3
BucharestClay
BrașovClay
- LRound of 32Andrei SavulescuSets won: 0Set 1: 3Victor IonitaSets won: 0Set 1: 0
Victor Ionita · Retired
Cluj-NapocaClay
- LRound of 16Matt ReidSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Victor IonitaSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
- WRound of 32Victor IonitaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Stefan VintiSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0
IașiClay
- WRound of 16Victor IonitaSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 6Vasile Alexandru GhileaSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 62Set 3: 4
- WRound of 32Victor IonitaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Marcel Ioan MironSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5
Stephan Hoiss3–3
OberhachingHard
- LQualifying R2Benjamin HassanSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Stephan HoissSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 0
- WQualifying R1Stephan HoissSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jakub PaulSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
HammametClay
- LRound of 32Mukund SasikumarSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Stephan HoissSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0
Stephan Hoiss · Retired
- WQualifying R3Stephan HoissSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Kento YamadaSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0
- WQualifying R2Stephan HoissSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Mohsen Hossein ZadeSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.