Stanislav Poplavskyy vs Emanuele Molina, Ashkelon 2011, Round of 16
Final score
Final
6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(5)Venue and conditions
Ashkelon Tennis CenterAshkelon, ISR
Outdoor hardCourt speed98.1Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
0Poplavskyy
1Molina
1 meeting- AshkelonRound of 16 · 2011HardThis matchEmanuele MolinaSets won: 2Set 1: 63Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Stanislav PoplavskyySets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 65
Form and path
Stanislav Poplavskyy3–3
BuchaClay
- LRound of 32Dmytro KamyninSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Stanislav PoplavskyySets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1
Stanislav Poplavskyy · Retired
- WQualifying R3Stanislav PoplavskyySets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Nazar AchourSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 2
- WQualifying R2Stanislav PoplavskyySets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Sergii AntoniukSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1
ColomboHard
Emanuele Molina3–3
CasinalboClay
- LRound of 32Mirko CutuliSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Emanuele MolinaSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 5
- WQualifying R2Emanuele MolinaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Alessandro CeppelliniSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- WQualifying R1Emanuele MolinaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Marco MiceliSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
Pula (Italy)Clay
- LRound of 32Gaston Arturo GrimolizziSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Emanuele MolinaSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5
Pula (Italy)Hard
- LQualifying R2Gianluca Di NicolaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Emanuele MolinaSets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
- WQualifying R1Emanuele MolinaSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Marco Di PrimaSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.