Ivo Minar vs Adrian Ungur, Rome 2011, Round of 16
Final score
Final
6-3 6-2Venue and conditions
Tennis Club GardenRome, ITA
ClayCourt speed4.7 vs last year91.0Very slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 20m3Aces0
2Double faults4
43Service points won33
9Service games played8
9Service games won5
8Return games played9
7/7100%Break points saved63%5/8
3/838%Break points converted0%0/7
Head to head
3Minar
1Ungur
4 meetings- RomeRound of 16 · 13 Apr 2011ClayThis matchIvo MinarSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Adrian UngurSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
- HamburgQualifying R1 · 13 Jul 2013ClayAdrian UngurSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Ivo MinarSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
- ComoRound of 16 · 1 Sept 2010ClayIvo MinarSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Adrian UngurSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 62
- SzczecinQuarterfinal · 21 Sept 2007ClayIvo MinarSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Adrian UngurSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 0
Adrian Ungur · Retired
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.