John Paul Fruttero vs Marek Czerwinski, Champaign Challenger 2010, Qualifying R3

Challenger · Qualifying R3 · Hard · Mon 15 Nov

Final

John Paul Fruttero

WinnerRank #1231

Fruttero won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 16–4

Set 24–6

Set 36–2

Marek Czerwinski

LostRank #1807

Venue

Atkins Tennis Center

Urbana, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

231 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Head to head

1Fruttero

0Czerwinski

1 meeting

Champaign ChallengerQualifying R3 · 15 Nov 2010HardThis match
John Paul Fruttero
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Marek Czerwinski
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 2

Form and path

John Paul Fruttero

No recent matches recorded.

Marek Czerwinski

Champaign CHThis week

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

John Paul Fruttero vs Marek Czerwinski, Champaign Challenger 2010, Qualifying R3

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research