Marc Gicquel vs Steve Darcis, Montpellier 2010, Qualifying R3
Final score
Final
7-6(3) 6-4Venue and conditions
Sud de France ArenaPérols, FRA
Indoor hardCourt speed107.1Fast
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksAltitude7 mSea level
Match stats
1h 28m6Aces3
2Double faults4
40Service points won49
11Service games played11
9Service games won10
11Return games played11
1/333%Break points saved50%1/2
1/250%Break points converted67%2/3
Head to head
2Gicquel
4Darcis
6 meetingsHard 1–2Grass 1–0Clay 0–2
- MontpellierQualifying R3 · 25 Oct 2010HardThis matchSteve DarcisSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Marc GicquelSets won: 0Set 1: 63Set 2: 4
- QuimperSemifinal · 16 Feb 2013HardMarc GicquelSets won: 2Set 1: 68Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Steve DarcisSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 5
- MonsSemifinal · 9 Oct 2010HardSteve DarcisSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7Marc GicquelSets won: 0Set 1: 63Set 2: 63
- s HertogenboschRound of 32 · 15 Jun 2009GrassMarc GicquelSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Steve DarcisSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
- AmersfoortSemifinal · 19 Jul 2008ClaySteve DarcisSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 7Marc GicquelSets won: 1Set 1: 63Set 2: 6Set 3: 5
- AmersfoortRound of 32 · 17 Jul 2007ClaySteve DarcisSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Marc GicquelSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.