Noam Okun vs Bernard Tomic, US Open 2010, Qualifying R2

Grand Slam · Qualifying R2 · Hard · Fri 27 Aug

Final

Noam Okun

WinnerRank #1046

Okun won in 3 sets · 1h 34m

2–1

Set 11–6

Set 26–3

Set 36–2

Bernard Tomic

LostRank #179

Venue

USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center

Flushing, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

0.5vs last year

Wind

16 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

63%

Moderate

Temperature

25°C

Warm

Altitude

5 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 34m

6Aces2

4Double faults4

38Service points won44

12Service games played12

8Service games won7

12Return games played12

5/956%Break points saved50%5/10

5/1050%Break points converted44%4/9

Head to head

1Okun

0Tomic

1 meeting

US OpenQualifying R2 · 27 Aug 2010HardThis match
Noam Okun
Sets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Bernard Tomic
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Noam Okun vs Bernard Tomic, US Open 2010, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research