Michael Lammer vs Nicolas Almagro, Gstaad 2010, Round of 16

ATP 250 · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 29 Jul

Final

Michael Lammer

LostRank #104111.459%

Almagro won in 3 sets · 1h 45m

1–2

Set 16–3

Set 23–6

Set 32–6

Nicolas Almagro

WinnerRank #8451.0791%

Venue

Roy Emerson Arena

Gstaad, SUI· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Slow

1.9vs last year

Wind

8 km/h

Light

Humidity

95%

Very humid

Temperature

14°C

Mild

Altitude

1054 m

High

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 45m

2Aces6

1Double faults4

42Service points won42

13Service games played13

6Service games won8

13Return games played13

5/1242%Break points saved29%2/7

5/771%Break points converted58%7/12

Head to head

0Lammer

1Almagro

1 meeting

GstaadRound of 16 · 29 Jul 2010ClayThis match
Nicolas Almagro
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Michael Lammer
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Michael Lammer vs Nicolas Almagro, Gstaad 2010, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research