Alexandre Renard vs Alexander Flock, Rotterdam 2010, Round of 16
Final score
Final
6-2 6-7(3) 6-3Venue and conditions
Victoria Tennis Club RotterdamRotterdam, NED
ClayCourt speed94.8Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
3Renard
1Flock
4 meetings- RotterdamRound of 16 · 2010ClayThis matchAlexander FlockSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 63Set 3: 6Alexandre RenardSets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 7Set 3: 3
- Bourg-en-BresseSemifinal · 2008ClayAlexandre RenardSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Alexander FlockSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 2
- Castel GandolfoRound of 16 · 2008ClayAlexandre RenardSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Alexander FlockSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
- BariQuarterfinal · 2008ClayAlexandre RenardSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Alexander FlockSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
Form and path
Alexandre Renard2–4
AngersClay
- LRound of 32Sergio Gutierrez FerrolSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Alexandre RenardSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
Cherbourg CHHard
Courmayeur CHHard
AntalyaHard
- LFinalArtem SmirnovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Alexandre RenardSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
Alexander Flock2–4
CologneClay
- LQualifying R1Andrei PlotniySets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Alexander FlockSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 4
KaarstCarpet
- LQualifying R1Lukas RuepkeSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 2Alexander FlockSets won: 0Set 1: 63Set 2: 0
Alexander Flock · Retired
Wolfsburg CHCarpet
NusslochCarpet
- LSemifinalNils LangerSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Alexander FlockSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0
Alexander Flock · Retired
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.