Benjamin Becker vs Henri Kontinen, s Hertogenbosch 2010, Round of 16

ATP 250 · Round of 16 · Grass · Wed 16 Jun

Final

Benjamin Becker

WinnerRank #10741.1883%

Becker won in 2 sets · 45m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–1

Henri Kontinen

LostRank #17005.8017%

Venue

Autotron Rosmalen

Rosmalen, NED· Grass

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Fast

1.1vs last year

Wind

21 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

64%

Moderate

Temperature

21°C

Mild

Altitude

7 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

45m

5Aces2

1Double faults5

31Service points won17

7Service games played8

7Service games won3

8Return games played7

2/2100%Break points saved17%1/6

5/683%Break points converted0%0/2

Head to head

1Becker

0Kontinen

1 meeting

s HertogenboschRound of 16 · 16 Jun 2010GrassThis match
Benjamin Becker
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Henri Kontinen
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Benjamin Becker vs Henri Kontinen, s Hertogenbosch 2010, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research