Jan Hajek vs Albert Ramos, Prostejov 2010, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
6-4 6-0
Venue and conditions
TK Agrofert ProstějovProstejov, CZE
ClayCourt speed1.2 vs last year93.2Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 4m4Aces0
0Double faults2
30Service points won29
8Service games played8
7Service games won3
8Return games played8
2/367%Break points saved55%6/11
5/1145%Break points converted33%1/3
Head to head
2Hajek
2Ramos
4 meetingsClay 2–1Hard 0–1
- ProstejovQuarterfinal · 3 Jun 2010ClayThis matchJan HajekSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Albert RamosSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 0
- Rome MastersRound of 64 · 13 May 2013ClayAlbert RamosSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Jan HajekSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 0
- Miami MastersRound of 128 · 20 Mar 2013HardAlbert RamosSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jan HajekSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1
- MarburgSemifinal · 26 Jun 2011ClayJan HajekSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Albert RamosSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.