Ariel Behar vs Gabriel Wanderley, Curitiba Challenger 2010, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Clay · Sat 17 Apr

Final

Ariel Behar

WinnerRank #1877

Behar won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 27–5

Gabriel Wanderley

LostRank #1747

Venue

Graciosa Country Club

Curitiba, BRA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

9 km/h

Light

Humidity

84%

Humid

Temperature

25°C

Warm

Altitude

917 m

High

Historical daily weather

Head to head

2Behar

0Wanderley

2 meetings

Clay 1–0Hard 1–0

Curitiba ChallengerQualifying R1 · 17 Apr 2010ClayThis match
Ariel Behar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Gabriel Wanderley
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5
Campos Do Jordao ChallengerQualifying R1 · 1 Aug 2009Hard
Ariel Behar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Gabriel Wanderley
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Ariel Behar vs Gabriel Wanderley, Curitiba Challenger 2010, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research