Steven Diez vs Emilio Rodriguez, Madrid 2010, Round of 16
Final score
Final
6-3 6-4Venue and conditions
Alhóndiga Sector III municipal tennis complexGetafe, ESP
Outdoor hardCourt speed97.7Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
0Diez
1Rodriguez
1 meeting- MadridRound of 16 · 2010HardThis matchEmilio RodriguezSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Steven DiezSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
Form and path
Steven Diez2–4
Heilbronn CHClay
VicClay
- LQuarterfinalLorenzo GiustinoSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Steven DiezSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1
Steven Diez · Retired
- WRound of 16Steven DiezSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Andres Santamarta RoigSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5
- WRound of 32Steven DiezSets won: 1Set 1: 6Michiel De KromSets won: 0Set 1: 1
Michiel De Krom · Retired
SabadellClay
Emilio Rodriguez3–3
MadridHard
- LQualifying R3Brian CuypersSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 6Emilio RodriguezSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 3
- WQualifying R2Emilio RodriguezSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Adam Sanjurjo HermidaSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
- WQualifying R1Emilio RodriguezSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Javier PadillaSets won: 0Set 1: 65Set 2: 3
OurenseHard
- LQualifying R1David Vega HernandezSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 63Set 3: 6Emilio RodriguezSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 7Set 3: 1
MadridClay
- LRound of 32Vasco MensuradoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 7Emilio RodriguezSets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 66
- WQualifying R3Emilio RodriguezSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 6Jose Antonio Salazar MartinSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.