Ivan Dodig vs Alex Kuznetsov, Bergamo Challenger 2010, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 11 Feb

Final

Ivan Dodig

WinnerRank #4231.5461%

Dodig won in 2 sets · 1h 37m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 27–5

Alex Kuznetsov

LostRank #8502.4039%

Venue

PalaNorda

Bergamo, ITA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

259 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 37m

9Aces7

1Double faults1

44Service points won46

11Service games played11

10Service games won8

11Return games played11

2/367%Break points saved57%4/7

3/743%Break points converted33%1/3

Head to head

1Dodig

0Kuznetsov

1 meeting

Bergamo ChallengerRound of 16 · 11 Feb 2010HardThis match
Ivan Dodig
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Alex Kuznetsov
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Ivan Dodig vs Alex Kuznetsov, Bergamo Challenger 2010, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research