Stephane Robert vs David Ferrer, Johannesburg 2010, Semifinal

ATP 250 · Semifinal · Hard · Sat 6 Feb

Final

Stephane Robert

WinnerRank #14868.7111%Upset

Robert won in 2 sets · 1h 36m

2–0

Set 17–5

Set 26–4

David Ferrer

LostRank #2241.1089%

Venue

Montecasino

Johannesburg (Fourways), RSA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

1.5vs last year

Wind

11 km/h

Light

Humidity

78%

Humid

Temperature

27°C

Warm

Altitude

1481 m

High

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 36m

3Aces4

6Double faults4

47Service points won44

11Service games played11

9Service games won7

11Return games played11

6/875%Break points saved20%1/5

4/580%Break points converted25%2/8

Head to head

1Robert

0Ferrer

1 meeting

JohannesburgSemifinal · 6 Feb 2010HardThis match
Stephane Robert
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
David Ferrer
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Stephane Robert vs David Ferrer, Johannesburg 2010, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research