Ivo Klec vs Go Soeda, Bergamo Challenger 2010, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sat 6 Feb

Final

Ivo Klec

LostRank #916

Soeda won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 16–2

Set 22–6

Set 36–7²

Go Soeda

WinnerRank #683

Venue

PalaNorda

Bergamo, ITA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

259 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Head to head

0Klec

3Soeda

3 meetings

Bergamo ChallengerQualifying R1 · 6 Feb 2010HardThis match
Go Soeda
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Ivo Klec
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 6²
Singapore ChallengerRound of 16 · 27 Jan 2011Hard
Go Soeda
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Ivo Klec
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 3
Ho Chi Minh City ChallengerRound of 16 · 16 Mar 2006Hard
Go Soeda
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Ivo Klec
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Ivo Klec vs Go Soeda, Bergamo Challenger 2010, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research