Ivan Navarro vs Robin Haase, Helsinki Challenger 2009, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Carpet · Thu 26 Nov

Final

Ivan Navarro

LostRank #19292.5038%

Haase won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 13–6

Set 26–4

Set 33–6

Robin Haase

WinnerRank #12061.5063%

Venue

Tali Tennis Center

Helsinki, FIN· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

23 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

96%

Very humid

Temperature

7°C

Cool

Altitude

0 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Navarro

1Haase

2 meetings

Carpet 0–1Hard 1–0

Helsinki ChallengerRound of 16 · 26 Nov 2009CarpetThis match
Robin Haase
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Ivan Navarro
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
TokyoRound of 64 · 1 Oct 2007Hard
Ivan Navarro
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 7⁷
Robin Haase
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6⁰

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Ivan Navarro vs Robin Haase, Helsinki Challenger 2009, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research