Thomas Oger vs Soong Jae Cho, Kuala Lumpur 2009, Semifinal
Final score
Final
6-7(0) 6-4 6-4Venue and conditions
National Tennis CentreKuala Lumpur, MAS
Outdoor hardCourt speed99.2Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
0Oger
1Cho
1 meeting- Kuala LumpurSemifinal · 2009HardThis matchSoong Jae ChoSets won: 2Set 1: 60Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Thomas OgerSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 4
Form and path
Thomas Oger1–5
Monte Carlo MastersClay
Monte Carlo MastersClay
Bagnoles-de-l'OrneClay
- LQualifying R2Maxime ChazalSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Thomas OgerSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
- WQualifying R1Thomas OgerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Manuel GuinardSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1
Monte Carlo MastersClay
BressuireHard
- LQuarterfinalMathieu RodriguesSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Thomas OgerSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
Soong Jae Cho3–3
AnseongClay
- LRound of 32Sang Woo NohSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Soong Jae ChoSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 64
- WQualifying R3Soong Jae ChoSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Seung Ri ChoiSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 0Set 3: 5
AnseongClay
- LQualifying R3Jae Min SeolSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Soong Jae ChoSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
- WQualifying R2Soong Jae ChoSets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Weibowen ZouSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 2
- WQualifying R1Soong Jae ChoSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Jaewoo ParkSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5
AnseongClay
- LQualifying R3Sanhui ShinSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Soong Jae ChoSets won: 0Set 1: 62Set 2: 2
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.