Conor Niland vs James Lemke, Niceville 2009, Final
Final score
Final
3-6 6-4 6-0Venue and conditions
Bluewater Bay Tennis CenterNiceville, USA
ClayCourt speed88.7Very slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Niland
1Lemke
2 meetings- NicevilleFinal · 2009ClayThis matchConor NilandSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6James LemkeSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 0
- BirminghamFinal · 2009ClayJames LemkeSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Conor NilandSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 5
Form and path
Conor Niland2–4
Kyoto CHCarpet
Singapore CHHard
MontpellierHard
James Lemke4–2
Glen IrisClay
- LRound of 16Alex BoltSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 2Set 3: 11James LemkeSets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 9
- WRound of 32James LemkeSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Leon FrostSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1
Melbourne CHHard
- LRound of 32Yuki BhambriSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6James LemkeSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 0
- WQualifying R3James LemkeSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Jacob GrillsSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 1
- WQualifying R2James LemkeSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Sam DowlerSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
- WQualifying R1James LemkeSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Kayne RyanSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 1
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.