Laurynas Grigelis vs Matthew Illingworth, Jersey 2 Challenger 2009, Qualifying R2

Challenger · Qualifying R2 · Carpet · Sun 8 Nov

Final

Laurynas Grigelis

LostRank #1340

Illingworth won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 16–4

Set 24–6

Set 33–6

Matthew Illingworth

WinnerRank #1309

Venue

Les Ormes Indoor Tennis Centre

Jersey, GBR· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

77 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Head to head

1Grigelis

1Illingworth

2 meetings

Carpet 0–1Hard 1–0

Jersey 2 ChallengerQualifying R2 · 8 Nov 2009CarpetThis match
Matthew Illingworth
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Laurynas Grigelis
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 3
WrexhamSemifinal · 2009Hard
Laurynas Grigelis
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Matthew Illingworth
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Laurynas Grigelis vs Matthew Illingworth, Jersey 2 Challenger 2009, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research