Ashwin Kumar vs Jordan Cox, Claremont 2009, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard

Final

Ashwin Kumar

LostRank #1735

Cox won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 22–6

Jordan Cox

WinnerRank #1613

Venue

Claremont Club

Claremont, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

437 m

Moderate

Head to head

0Kumar

1Cox

1 meeting

ClaremontRound of 16 · 2009HardThis match
Jordan Cox
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Ashwin Kumar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2

Form and path

Ashwin Kumar2–4

Winnetka CHHard

LQualifying R1
Abraham Souza
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Ashwin Kumar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 6²

Knoxville CHHard

BirminghamClay

LRound of 32
Derek Difazio
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Ashwin Kumar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Tiburon CHHard

Jordan Cox3–3

Lexington CHHard

LQualifying R1
Mitchell Krueger
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jordan Cox
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

PittsburghClay

LRound of 16
Jason Tahir
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jordan Cox
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
WRound of 32
Jordan Cox
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Nathaniel Gorham
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1

InnisbrookClay

LQuarterfinal
Chase Buchanan
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Jordan Cox
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5
WRound of 16
Jordan Cox
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Ruben Gonzales
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6⁵Set 3: 1
WRound of 32
Jordan Cox
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Michael Venus
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Ashwin Kumar vs Jordan Cox, Claremont 2009, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research