Nicolas Massu vs Fernando Gonzalez, US Open 2009, Round of 128
Final score
Final
Gonzalez won in 3 sets · 2h 5m
0–3
Set 13–6
Set 23–6
Set 33–6
Venue and conditions
USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis CenterFlushing, USA
Outdoor hardCourt speed2.7 vs last year100.0Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
2h 5m6Aces12
6Double faults2
50Service points won54
13Service games played14
7Service games won12
14Return games played13
11/1765%Break points saved50%2/4
2/450%Break points converted35%6/17
Head to head
2Massu
5Gonzalez
7 meetingsHard 0–2Clay 2–3
- US OpenRound of 128 · 1 Sept 2009HardThis matchFernando GonzalezSets won: 3Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Nicolas MassuSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3Set 3: 3
- Rome MastersRound of 16 · 10 May 2007ClayFernando GonzalezSets won: 2Set 1: 64Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Nicolas MassuSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 3Set 3: 4
- Cincinnati MastersRound of 64 · 15 Aug 2006HardFernando GonzalezSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Nicolas MassuSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- Vina del MarSemifinal · 4 Feb 2006ClayNicolas MassuSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 7Set 3: 6Fernando GonzalezSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 63Set 3: 4
- Vina del MarQuarterfinal · 13 Feb 2004ClayFernando GonzalezSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Nicolas MassuSets won: 0Set 1: 64Set 2: 3
- San Luis PotosiRound of 16 · 2000ClayNicolas MassuSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Fernando GonzalezSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 65
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.