Nicolas Lapentti vs Juan Carlos Ferrero, Washington 2009, Round of 64
Final score
Final
Ferrero won in 3 sets · 2h 30m
1–2
Set 14–6
Set 27–65
Set 30–6
Venue and conditions
William H.G. FitzGerald Tennis CenterWashington, USA
Outdoor hardCourt speed1.4 vs last year101.0Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
2h 30m10Aces2
1Double faults4
57Service points won71
14Service games played14
10Service games won14
14Return games played14
2/633%Break points saved100%8/8
0/80%Break points converted67%4/6
Head to head
2Lapentti
7Ferrero
9 meetingsHard 0–4Clay 2–2Carpet 0–1
- WashingtonRound of 64 · 4 Aug 2009HardThis matchJuan Carlos FerreroSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 65Set 3: 6Nicolas LapenttiSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 0
- ViennaRound of 16 · 13 Oct 2005HardJuan Carlos FerreroSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Nicolas LapenttiSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- Canada MastersRound of 32 · 2001HardJuan Carlos FerreroSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Nicolas LapenttiSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
- KitzbuhelQuarterfinal · 2001ClayNicolas LapenttiSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Juan Carlos FerreroSets won: 0Set 1: 66Set 2: 2
- Hamburg MastersRound of 16 · 2001ClayJuan Carlos FerreroSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Nicolas LapenttiSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
- Rome MastersSemifinal · 2001ClayJuan Carlos FerreroSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Nicolas LapenttiSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.