Albert Loncaric vs Gerald Melzer, Umag 2009, Qualifying R1

ATP 250 · Qualifying R1 · Clay · Sat 25 Jul

Final

Albert Loncaric

LostRank #1331

Melzer won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 12–6

Set 26–3

Set 35–7

Gerald Melzer

WinnerRank #1610

Venue

ATP Stadium Goran Ivanišević

Umag, CRO· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Slow

0.8vs last year

Wind

25 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

56%

Moderate

Temperature

27°C

Warm

Altitude

0 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1Aces7

5Double faults2

51Service points won61

14Service games played15

8Service games won10

15Return games played14

10/1663%Break points saved55%6/11

5/1145%Break points converted38%6/16

Head to head

0Loncaric

1Melzer

1 meeting

UmagQualifying R1 · 25 Jul 2009ClayThis match
Gerald Melzer
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 7
Albert Loncaric
Sets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Albert Loncaric vs Gerald Melzer, Umag 2009, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research