Catalin Ionut Gard vs Jaan Frederik Brunken, Römerberg 2009, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
4-6 6-1 7-5Venue and conditions
TC RömerbergRömerberg, GER
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Gard
0Brunken
1 meeting- RömerbergQuarterfinal · 2009ClayThis matchCatalin Ionut GardSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Jaan Frederik BrunkenSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 5
Form and path
Catalin Ionut Gard3–3
AtlantaHard
PaduaClay
- LQualifying R3Marcel FelderSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Catalin Ionut GardSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 2
- WQualifying R2Catalin Ionut GardSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Nicola VidalSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
PlovdivClay
- LQuarterfinalMartin BeranSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Catalin Ionut GardSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
- WRound of 16Catalin Ionut GardSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Frederik PressSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
- WRound of 32Catalin Ionut GardSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Diego Jose Manrique VelazquezSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
Jaan Frederik Brunken3–3
HanoverClay
- LQuarterfinalDemian RaabSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jaan Frederik BrunkenSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
- WRound of 16Jaan Frederik BrunkenSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Prajnesh GunneswaranSets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 2
- WRound of 32Jaan Frederik BrunkenSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Lucas GerchSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3
Braunschweig CHClay
ShrewsburyHard
- LRound of 32Jathan MalikSets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 7Set 3: 7Jaan Frederik BrunkenSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 68Set 3: 5
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.