Ivan Dodig vs Lukas Lacko, Halle 2009, Qualifying R2

ATP 250 · Qualifying R2 · Grass · Sun 7 Jun

Final

Ivan Dodig

LostRank #423

Lacko won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 11–6

Set 26–3

Set 36–7⁴

Lukas Lacko

WinnerRank #1505

Venue

OWL ARENA

Halle, GER· Grass

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Average

3.9vs last year

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

82%

Humid

Temperature

15°C

Mild

Altitude

123 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Dodig

2Lacko

3 meetings

Grass 0–1Hard 1–1

HalleQualifying R2 · 7 Jun 2009GrassThis match
Lukas Lacko
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 7⁷
Ivan Dodig
Sets won: 1Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6⁴
Miami MastersRound of 128 · 21 Mar 2013Hard
Ivan Dodig
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Lukas Lacko
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 0Set 3: 4
Tashkent ChallengerSemifinal · 13 Oct 2012Hard
Lukas Lacko
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Ivan Dodig
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 6⁴

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Ivan Dodig vs Lukas Lacko, Halle 2009, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research