Potito Starace vs Jan Hajek, Prostejov 2009, Semifinal
Final score
Final
6-4 7-5
Venue and conditions
TK Agrofert ProstějovProstejov, CZE
ClayCourt speed92.0Slow
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
ConditionsHistorical daily weather
Head to head
6Starace
3Hajek
9 meetings- ProstejovSemifinal · 5 Jun 2009ClayThis matchJan HajekSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Potito StaraceSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5
- San MarinoQuarterfinal · 12 Aug 2011ClayPotito StaraceSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jan HajekSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 3
- MunichRound of 32 · 26 Apr 2011ClayPotito StaraceSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Jan HajekSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 0
- Rome MastersRound of 64 · 26 Apr 2010ClayPotito StaraceSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jan HajekSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
- BarcelonaRound of 64 · 19 Apr 2010ClayJan HajekSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Potito StaraceSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4
- GstaadRound of 32 · 10 Jul 2007ClayPotito StaraceSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Jan HajekSets won: 0Set 1: 64Set 2: 1
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.