Sam Groth vs Lukas Lacko, Fergana Challenger 2009, Final

Challenger · Final · Hard · Sat 23 May

Final

Sam Groth

LostRank #11551.9049%

Lacko won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 16–4

Set 25–7

Set 36–7⁴

Lukas Lacko

WinnerRank #15051.8051%

Venue

Istiklol Tennis Club

Fergana, UZB· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

12 km/h

Light

Humidity

60%

Moderate

Temperature

27°C

Warm

Altitude

592 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Groth

2Lacko

2 meetings

Hard 0–1Clay 0–1

Fergana ChallengerFinal · 23 May 2009HardThis match
Lukas Lacko
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 7⁷
Sam Groth
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5Set 3: 6⁴
ParmaRound of 32 · 2006Clay
Lukas Lacko
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 7⁷
Sam Groth
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6³Set 2: 6⁴

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Sam Groth vs Lukas Lacko, Fergana Challenger 2009, Final

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research