Alexander Kudryavtsev vs Sam Groth, Fergana Challenger 2009, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Hard · Thu 21 May

Final

Alexander Kudryavtsev

LostRank #1145

Groth won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 16–4

Set 26–7¹

Set 32–6

Sam Groth

WinnerRank #1155

Venue

Istiklol Tennis Club

Fergana, UZB· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

11 km/h

Light

Humidity

66%

Moderate

Temperature

24°C

Warm

Altitude

592 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Kudryavtsev

1Groth

2 meetings

Fergana ChallengerQuarterfinal · 21 May 2009HardThis match
Sam Groth
Sets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6
Alexander Kudryavtsev
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 6¹Set 3: 2
Seoul ChallengerQuarterfinal · 13 May 2016Hard
Alexander Kudryavtsev
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4
Sam Groth
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1
Sam Groth · Retired

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Alexander Kudryavtsev vs Sam Groth, Fergana Challenger 2009, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research