James Blake vs Albert Montanes, Estoril 2009, Final

ATP 250 · Final · Clay · Sun 10 May

Final

James Blake

LostRank #10201.6361%

Montanes won in 3 sets · 2h 13m

1–2

Set 17–5

Set 26–7⁶

Set 30–6

Albert Montanes

WinnerRank #3352.5039%Upset

Venue

Complexo de Ténis do Jamor

Cruz Quebrada, POR· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Very slow

0.5vs last year

Wind

24 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

83%

Humid

Temperature

18°C

Mild

Altitude

14 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

2h 13m

5Aces8

7Double faults3

70Service points won65

15Service games played15

11Service games won13

15Return games played15

5/956%Break points saved75%6/8

2/825%Break points converted44%4/9

Head to head

0Blake

1Montanes

1 meeting

EstorilFinal · 10 May 2009ClayThis match
Albert Montanes
Sets won: 2Set 1: 5Set 2: 7⁸Set 3: 6
James Blake
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 6⁶Set 3: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

James Blake vs Albert Montanes, Estoril 2009, Final

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research