Marco Mirnegg vs Martin Fafl, Teplice 2009, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
6-1 6-2Venue and conditions
Viamont LTC / LTK Teplice, Na LetneTeplice, CZE
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsForecast not yet available
Head to head
1Mirnegg
0Fafl
1 meeting- TepliceQuarterfinal · 2009ClayThis matchMarco MirneggSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Martin FaflSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2
Form and path
Marco Mirnegg5–1
TrierClay
- WQuarterfinalMarco MirneggSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6James LemkeSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0
- WRound of 16Marco MirneggSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Robert VargaSets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4
- WRound of 32Marco MirneggSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Marius ZaySets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 1
Braunschweig CHClay
- LRound of 32Olivier PatienceSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7Marco MirneggSets won: 0Set 1: 62Set 2: 64
- WQualifying R3Marco MirneggSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 7Pablo SantosSets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 5
- WQualifying R2Marco MirneggSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Roman VogeliSets won: 0Set 1: 62Set 2: 4
Martin Fafl3–3
Prague CHClay
Pula (Croatia)Clay
- LRound of 32Kevin KrawietzSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Martin FaflSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 3
- WQualifying R4Martin FaflSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6Lucas ZweiliSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 2
- WQualifying R3Martin FaflSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Piotr BaranskiSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2
- WQualifying R2Martin FaflSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Djordje ZafirovicSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 1
HeraklionHard
- LRound of 32Dennis NovakSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Martin FaflSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
Martin Fafl · Retired
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.