Andis Juska vs Vincent Millot, Mexico City Challenger 2009, Qualifying R2

Challenger · Qualifying R2 · Hard · Sun 12 Apr

Final

Andis Juska

LostRank #1409

Millot won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 16–3

Set 21–6

Set 36–7⁵

Vincent Millot

WinnerRank #1400

Venue

Club Casablanca San Ángel

Mexico City, MEX· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

17 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

37%

Comfortable

Temperature

27°C

Warm

Altitude

2448 m

Very high

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Juska

2Millot

2 meetings

Mexico City ChallengerQualifying R2 · 12 Apr 2009HardThis match
Vincent Millot
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Andis Juska
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 6⁵
NeversQuarterfinal · 2008Hard
Vincent Millot
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 7⁷
Andis Juska
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 6⁵

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Andis Juska vs Vincent Millot, Mexico City Challenger 2009, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research