Jan Minar vs Ervin Eleskovic, Tipton 2009, Round of 16

Final

Jan Minar

WinnerATP: 1436

Minar won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 17–6⁵

Set 26–2

Ervin Eleskovic

LostATP: 1189

Tipton Sports AcademyTipton, GBR

Indoor hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

102.7Average

Venue average

Altitude131 mLow

Head to head

1Minar

1Eleskovic

2 meetings

Hard 1–0Carpet 0–1

TiptonRound of 16 · 2009HardThis match
Jan Minar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Ervin Eleskovic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 2
WolfsburgQualifying R1 · 25 Feb 2006Carpet
Ervin Eleskovic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Jan Minar
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 4

Form and path

Jan Minar3–3

ŘíčanyHard

LRound of 32
Mikalai Haliak
Sets won: 2Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Jan Minar
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 2

MiloviceHard

Jablonec nad NisouCarpet

Ervin Eleskovic3–3

BåstadClay

LRound of 32
Bastian Trinker
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Ervin Eleskovic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

KarlskronaClay

LSemifinal
Christian Lindell
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Ervin Eleskovic
Sets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 0
WQuarterfinal
Ervin Eleskovic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Patrik Rosenholm
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 3
WRound of 16
Ervin Eleskovic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Isak Arvidsson
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 2
WRound of 32
Ervin Eleskovic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Oscar Forsell
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁶Set 2: 2

HeraklionHard

LQuarterfinal
Alexander Ward
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Ervin Eleskovic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jan Minar vs Ervin Eleskovic, Tipton 2009, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research