Pavel Snobel vs Benedikt Dorsch, Bergamo Challenger 2009, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 6 Mar

Final

Pavel Snobel

LostRank #15022.2043%

Dorsch won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 26–7⁴

Benedikt Dorsch

WinnerRank #7761.6557%

Venue

PalaNorda

Bergamo, ITA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

259 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

0Aces0

3Double faults0

48Service points won48

10Service games played10

8Service games won10

10Return games played10

7/978%Break points saved100%3/3

0/30%Break points converted22%2/9

Head to head

0Snobel

1Dorsch

1 meeting

Bergamo ChallengerQuarterfinal · 6 Mar 2009HardThis match
Benedikt Dorsch
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Pavel Snobel
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 6⁴

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Pavel Snobel vs Benedikt Dorsch, Bergamo Challenger 2009, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research