Jean Christophe Faurel vs Nicolas Renavand, Cherbourg 2009, Qualifying R1
Final score
Final
6-3 6-3Venue and conditions
Complexe Jean JauresCherbourg, FRA
Indoor hardCourt speed102.5Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksVenue average
Altitude25 mSea level
Head to head
2Faurel
4Renavand
6 meetingsHard 2–1Clay 0–3
- CherbourgQualifying R1 · 28 Feb 2009HardThis matchJean Christophe FaurelSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Nicolas RenavandSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3
- BesanconQualifying R3 · 23 Feb 2009HardNicolas RenavandSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 6Jean Christophe FaurelSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 63Set 3: 4
- OrleansRound of 32 · 9 Sept 2008HardJean Christophe FaurelSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6Nicolas RenavandSets won: 1Set 1: 2Set 2: 6Set 3: 2
- MontaubanQuarterfinal · 2008ClayNicolas RenavandSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 7Jean Christophe FaurelSets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 5
- LuganoQualifying R2 · 10 Jun 2007ClayNicolas RenavandSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7Jean Christophe FaurelSets won: 0Set 1: 64Set 2: 5
- GrasseRound of 32 · 2005ClayNicolas RenavandSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7Jean Christophe FaurelSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 64
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.