Nathan Healey vs Marius Copil, Sacramento Challenger 2008, Qualifying R1

Challenger · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Sat 4 Oct

Final

Nathan Healey

WinnerRank #1134

Healey won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 16–3

Set 24–6

Set 36–2

Marius Copil

LostRank #1021

Venue

Sutter Lawn Tennis Club

Sacramento, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

16 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

70%

Humid

Temperature

23°C

Warm

Altitude

15 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Healey

0Copil

1 meeting

Sacramento ChallengerQualifying R1 · 4 Oct 2008HardThis match
Nathan Healey
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 6
Marius Copil
Sets won: 1Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 2

Form and path

Nathan Healey3–1

Bogota 3 CHClay

Marius Copil

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Nathan Healey vs Marius Copil, Sacramento Challenger 2008, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research