Vincent Spadea vs Peter Polansky, Waco Challenger 2008, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Hard · Thu 18 Sept

Final

Vincent Spadea

WinnerRank #14741.3569%

Spadea won in 3 sets

2–1

Set 16–4

Set 26–7³

Set 37–6⁶

Peter Polansky

LostRank #14753.0031%

Venue

Hurd Tennis Center

Waco, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

12 km/h

Light

Humidity

68%

Moderate

Temperature

25°C

Warm

Altitude

118 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

2Spadea

0Polansky

2 meetings

Waco ChallengerQuarterfinal · 18 Sept 2008HardThis match
Vincent Spadea
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6³Set 3: 7⁸
Peter Polansky
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 6⁶
Carson ChallengerRound of 16 · 29 Jan 2009Hard
Vincent Spadea
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Peter Polansky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6¹Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Vincent Spadea vs Peter Polansky, Waco Challenger 2008, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research