Mikhail Elgin vs Louk Sorensen, Donetsk Challenger 2008, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 11 Sept

Final

Mikhail Elgin

LostRank #16621.8550%

Sorensen won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 21–6

Louk Sorensen

WinnerRank #11181.8550%

Venue

Venue not available

Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

—

No reading

Forecast not yet available

Head to head

0Elgin

2Sorensen

2 meetings

Hard 0–1Carpet 0–1

Donetsk ChallengerRound of 16 · 11 Sept 2008HardThis match
Louk Sorensen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Mikhail Elgin
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1
Wolfsburg ChallengerRound of 32 · 26 Feb 2008Carpet
Louk Sorensen
Sets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Mikhail Elgin
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Mikhail Elgin vs Louk Sorensen, Donetsk Challenger 2008, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research