Sarvar Ikramov vs Timothy Patient, Almaty 2008, Round of 16
Final score
Final
1-6 6-1 6-1Venue and conditions
Venue not available
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditions
Forecast not yet available
Head to head
1Ikramov
0Patient
1 meeting- AlmatyRound of 16 · 2008ClayThis matchSarvar IkramovSets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Timothy PatientSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 1
Form and path
Sarvar Ikramov2–4
Tashkent CHHard
NamanganHard
- LRound of 32Abduvoris SaitmukhamedovSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Sarvar IkramovSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
AndijanHard
- LRound of 32Alexey ProkopchukSets won: 2Set 1: 64Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Sarvar IkramovSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 1Set 3: 2
Samarkand CHClay
ShymkentClay
- WRound of 32Sarvar IkramovSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Dmitry ResnyanskiySets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 0
Timothy Patient2–3
AlmatyThis week
- WRound of 32Timothy PatientSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Dmitriy MakeyevSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 1
DublinCarpet
- LRound of 16Baptiste BayetSets won: 2Set 1: 64Set 2: 7Set 3: 6Timothy PatientSets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 63Set 3: 4
- WRound of 32Timothy PatientSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Navdeep SinghSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 3
KalamataHard
- LRound of 32Konstantinos MikosSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Timothy PatientSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
EdinburghHard
- LRound of 16Markus BayerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Timothy PatientSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- WRound of 32Timothy PatientSets won: 2Set 1: 3Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Andrew BanksSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.