Marc Gicquel vs Jurgen Melzer, s Hertogenbosch 2008, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
6-3 6-4
Venue and conditions
Autotron RosmalenRosmalen, NED
GrassCourt speed3.7 vs last year105.1Fast
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 40m5Aces5
0Double faults4
42Service points won35
10Service games played9
9Service games won6
9Return games played10
5/683%Break points saved67%6/9
3/933%Break points converted17%1/6
Head to head
2Gicquel
2Melzer
4 meetingsGrass 1–1Hard 1–1
- s HertogenboschQuarterfinal · 19 Jun 2008GrassThis matchMarc GicquelSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Jurgen MelzerSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
- MetzSemifinal · 7 Oct 2006HardJurgen MelzerSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Marc GicquelSets won: 0Set 1: 63Set 2: 3
- New HavenQualifying R3 · 20 Aug 2006HardMarc GicquelSets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 6Jurgen MelzerSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 3
- WimbledonQualifying R2 · 20 Jun 2002GrassJurgen MelzerSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Marc GicquelSets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 3
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.