Sebastian Rieschick vs Grega Zemlja, Recanati Challenger 2008, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 19 Jun

Final

Sebastian Rieschick

LostRank #756

Zemlja won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 15–7

Set 21–6

Grega Zemlja

WinnerRank #1144

Venue

Circolo Tennis Francesco Guzzini, Recanati

Recanati, ITA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

12 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

79%

Humid

Temperature

25°C

Warm

Altitude

195 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Rieschick

2Zemlja

2 meetings

Hard 0–1Clay 0–1

Recanati ChallengerRound of 16 · 19 Jun 2008HardThis match
Grega Zemlja
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Sebastian Rieschick
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 1
KasselRound of 32 · 2005Clay
Grega Zemlja
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7
Sebastian Rieschick
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Sebastian Rieschick vs Grega Zemlja, Recanati Challenger 2008, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research