Edouard Roger-Vasselin vs Louk Sorensen, Wimbledon 2008, Qualifying R2

Grand Slam · Qualifying R2 · Grass · Tue 17 Jun

Final · Retired

Edouard Roger-Vasselin

WinnerRank #8061.3072%

Roger-Vasselin won · Retired

1–1

Set 16–7⁴

Set 26–3

Set 33–1

Louk Sorensen

LostRank #11183.3028%

Venue

All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club

London, GBR· Grass

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Fast

0.9vs last year

Wind

21 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

73%

Humid

Temperature

18°C

Mild

Altitude

37 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Roger-Vasselin

0Sorensen

1 meeting

WimbledonQualifying R2 · 17 Jun 2008GrassThis match
Edouard Roger-Vasselin
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6⁴Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
Louk Sorensen
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 3Set 3: 1
Louk Sorensen · Retired
Rabat ChallengerRound of 16 · 21 Mar 2007Clay
Edouard Roger-Vasselin
Louk Sorensen
Louk Sorensen · Walkover

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Edouard Roger-Vasselin vs Louk Sorensen, Wimbledon 2008, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research