Laurent Recouderc vs Alexander Sadecky, Bytom Challenger 2008, Round of 32

Challenger · Round of 32 · Clay · Tue 17 Jun

Final

Laurent Recouderc

WinnerRank #1561

Recouderc won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 27–6⁷

Alexander Sadecky

LostRank #1177

Venue

Górnik Bytom Tennis Club

Bytom, POL· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

12 km/h

Light

Humidity

78%

Humid

Temperature

19°C

Mild

Altitude

282 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

2Recouderc

0Sadecky

2 meetings

Clay 1–0Hard 1–0

Bytom ChallengerRound of 32 · 17 Jun 2008ClayThis match
Laurent Recouderc
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁹
Alexander Sadecky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 6⁷
Geneva ChallengerQualifying R2 · 27 Oct 2013Hard
Laurent Recouderc
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Alexander Sadecky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6³Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Laurent Recouderc vs Alexander Sadecky, Bytom Challenger 2008, Round of 32

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research