Mario Ancic vs Ivo Minar, s Hertogenbosch 2008, Round of 32
Final score
Final
6-1 7-6(0)
Venue and conditions
Autotron RosmalenRosmalen, NED
GrassCourt speed3.7 vs last year105.1Fast
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 8m3Aces1
0Double faults0
39Service points won42
9Service games played10
9Service games won7
10Return games played9
0/0Break points saved57%4/7
3/743%Break points converted0/0
Head to head
2Ancic
1Minar
3 meetingsGrass 1–0Clay 1–1
- s HertogenboschRound of 32 · 15 Jun 2008GrassThis matchMario AncicSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Ivo MinarSets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 60
- OstravaRound of 32 · 27 Apr 2010ClayIvo MinarSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Mario AncicSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 4Set 3: 5
- Monte Carlo MastersRound of 64 · 21 Apr 2008ClayMario AncicSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Ivo MinarSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.