Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Jerzy Janowicz, Wroclaw Challenger 2008, Round of 16

Challenger · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 31 Jan

Final

Sergiy Stakhovsky

WinnerRank #6781.3569%

Stakhovsky won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–4

Jerzy Janowicz

LostRank #7353.0031%

Venue

Hala Orbita

Wroclaw, POL· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

119 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

8Aces7

0Double faults4

41Service points won43

10Service games played9

10Service games won7

9Return games played10

0/0Break points saved75%6/8

2/825%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Stakhovsky

0Janowicz

1 meeting

Wroclaw ChallengerRound of 16 · 31 Jan 2008HardThis match
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Jerzy Janowicz
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Jerzy Janowicz, Wroclaw Challenger 2008, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research